Oz Round Table

The Oz Round Table boards => The Round Table => Topic started by: imperfect on June 01, 2009, 09:28:18 AM

Title: What do you all think of this??
Post by: imperfect on June 01, 2009, 09:28:18 AM
http://repxchange.com/

It looks like a great idea but you have to put some pretty sensitive info in to become a member...would you do it?? :huh:
Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: *barny* on June 01, 2009, 09:42:28 AM
No thanks..

Some nutter's "bad buyer" may be gold for me...

But then, I've never had a crook buyer.

 :wine:
Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: imperfect on June 01, 2009, 10:06:15 AM
Yeah...I've only ever had one bady and ebay sorted her out..

I think this would be better used for a "scammer identifier" rather then a grumpy seller vent..don't you?
Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: *r3830* on June 01, 2009, 10:41:12 AM
While I am truly empathetic towards both bad seller and buyer experiences.... alarm bells ring with this idea. Remember the database set up some time ago that accepted information about bad 'P' plate drivers? This sort of thing is open to misuse / abuse by others with a grudge...... Given the many, many examples of this sort of thing over on the Ebay discussion boards, need I say more?

Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: imperfect on June 01, 2009, 10:55:40 AM
Very good point r3830!!!

Could there be some legal issues also??
Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: *CountessA* on June 01, 2009, 11:07:23 AM
I can see the appeal, but I can also see the dangers. It could be Grudge City. Without some way of investigating the submitted buyer names, it lends a problematic air to the whole thing.
Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: *r3830* on June 01, 2009, 12:44:09 PM
Did someone mention the possibility of legal issues...... well, I was bored, so I read their conditions. Should answer at least a few questions...... Reminds me a little of the T&C's of Paypal!!!


Usage of Collected Information:

    * RepXchange uses collected information to provide, maintain and enhance the features and services found on the site. This information may be used, without further consent, for administrative purposes, for customer service purposes, to address intellectual property infringement, rights of privacy, or defamation issues, or to contact you regarding any content that you have posted via our site.

RepXchange may also disclose your information if required to do so by law or in the good-faith belief that such action is necessary to comply with state and federal laws or respond to a court order, judicial or other government subpoena, or warrant. In some cases, we may make such disclosures without first providing notice to you.

International Visitors:

RepXchange is hosted in the United States and is intended for visitors located within the United States. If you nonetheless choose to use the RepXchange from the European Union or other regions of the world with laws governing data collection and use that may differ from U.S. law, then please note that you are transferring your personally identifiable information outside of those regions to the United States and you consent to that transfer.
Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: imperfect on June 01, 2009, 03:42:32 PM
Well, there you go...LOL!!!

Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: cueperkins on June 01, 2009, 03:56:36 PM
Is this an American Mob R3830?  Sorry haven't looked, too many things open already, but I'll take your word for it.  The UA seems to be fairly typical of an unconscionable entity that reverses all liability and prostitutes consumer privacy.....so what's new?...lol  This seems to be the benchmark of E-Commerce.

Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: *r3830* on June 01, 2009, 10:57:48 PM
But then again, they appear to be only a venue! Now, where have I heard that said before.... the mind does boggle!
Title: Re: What do you all think of this??
Post by: *Brum6y* on June 02, 2009, 02:44:11 AM
The idea has merit - in principle - but it is the vexatious reporting issue that is a minefield and I wouldn't go anywhere near it.

What right of reply is there? What procedures are in place for amending incorrect information? How, in fact, is correct information determined when someone states one thing and the subject objects?

What of the legal implications of action being taken against someone who has been maligned - as an example, by a redneck vigilante?


IF the quality of the information was accurate and reliable, with the appropriate safeguards, then I might take a closer look.  However, in all honesty, I believe the inimitable Mr Phelps and his Impossible Mission team could not present such a solution - even with the full resources of Hollywood at their disposal.