Oz Round Table

The Oz Round Table boards => The Round Table => Topic started by: *smee* on November 17, 2009, 10:00:27 PM

Title: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *smee* on November 17, 2009, 10:00:27 PM
As previously mentioned Chris Dawson has agreed to partake in this Q & A Session ,
He will be available here from approx 9pm Wednesday night 18th
Chris was the author of the 3 part series recently on tamebay about best match ...
the links to those sessions are below
http://tamebay.com/2009/11/best-match-secrets-part-1-getting-found.html
http://tamebay.com/2009/11/best-match-secrets-part-2-how-products-are-sorted.html
http://tamebay.com/2009/11/best-match-secrets-part-3-5-top-tips-for-best-match.html

If you are interested in learning about the ins and outs of this enigma called best match please read these links ... and hit Chris with your questions upon his arrival tommorrow night , please dont post questions prioe as I think it would be good if we can conduct this a bit like a talk back session ... a question followed by answer etc etc , wherever possible
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *CountessA* on November 17, 2009, 10:08:30 PM
This thread is temporarily locked in anticipation of Chris's appearance tomorrow evening. You may want to prepare your questions in a Word document beforehand, ready to cut-and-paste as soon as this thread hits "UNLOCKED" status.

...

and since I don't want to inadvertently leave it locked, I'm unlocking it now.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 08:53:18 PM
 Hi Chris,

Thank you for giving us your time. the question I have is if I was selling for example, the godfather set of movies as a BIN with 6 to sell which is more important for best match top of search list " the title" IE ( DVD set of godfather all three movies ) or similar tiltles . Or getting sales and relisting with same title?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:02:11 PM
Morning all, or evening there I guess

Many thanks for welcoming me as a guest to your boards. I'll do my best to convey eBay's official position on Best (worst?? ;-) ) match as well as as many tips for legally gaming it as I can
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:03:58 PM
welcome chris, please see my question above.

Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:05:17 PM
Hi Chris,

Thank you for giving us your time. the question I have is if I was selling for example, the godfather set of movies as a BIN with 6 to sell which is more important for best match top of search list " the title" IE ( DVD set of godfather all three movies ) or similar tiltles . Or getting sales and relisting with same title?

I would suggest using tools like Terapeak to find the MOST relevant keywords that previous listings have sold with. But the overriding factor in Best Match is sales and price. If you have the best or close to best price and you have recent sales you're on to a winner, although I know that's likely to drive prices and profits ever lower so you need to balance that.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:08:33 PM
I've got 7 tips for getting you item kick started in Best Match, some of which you may be able to use depending on which eBay site you list on:

1) Featured First

Featured First is the only sure fire way to the top of search results but it’s going to cost you (£44.95 for up to ten days, £134.95 for up to 30 days for eBay UK). Featured First is a great way to buy exposure but, as it’s success starts to be seen, more and more sellers are starting to use the listing enhancement.

If you’re one of just two sellers to use Featured First in a category then you’ll always be at the top, but as more sellers start to use the feature you listing will appear in a rotation and the exposure starts to fall.

This is a feature that should only ever be used once on a listing with good run rate, and then recent sales should be keeping you at the top of search. However, for slower sell through rate, high value items, Featured First is definitely worth considering on an ongoing basis.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:09:23 PM
2) Auctions to drive sales

Yes auctions are old hat, as a seller you probably prefer to know you’ll get the price you want and many buyers want to buy instantly rather than bid. Well that might be the case but auctions are still sorted using Ending Soonest and are still a great route to getting your listings to the top of search results.

Auctions at an attractive start prices will get buyers looking, strong links from auctions are a great way to kick start some sales on your main BIN listings. Look at the auction as a loss leader to gain attention and drive traffic from the auction to your BIN. Also consider trying an auction with a BIN price for an instant sale because….
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:09:40 PM
3) Auction to Recent Sales Advantaged BIN

… It’s possible to gain a Recent Sales advantage in Best Match from an auction and this is the main reason sellers should be experimenting with the listing format. If your auction sells at a final value price that you’d be willing to sell at (or below), relist it but convert it to a BIN.

In testing it appears that Recent Sales advantage is transferred from a sold auction to a new BIN listing and can propel the BIN towards the top of Best Match at best, and above an identical BIN listing with no sales at worst. Auctions can be used to actively gain a head start for a multi-quantity BIN.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:09:56 PM
4) Best Offer

On your first listing of a new product always add Best Offer. It only takes a few sales to make a huge difference in search results standings. Some experimentation with this tactic has thrown up some interesting trends, the most significant of which is that early sales will tend to be Best Offers, but once an item reaches the top of search results buyers start to buy at the full price rather than making further Best Offers.

It’s well worth accepting the first one or two offers at less than you’d normally consider, in order to boost your listing in search results. Offers are worth accepting even if you make a slight loss on a couple of sales – it’s still probably still cheaper than paying for Featured First, to get to the top of the page.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:10:10 PM
5) Email Marketing

Get smart about your email marketing, use it to drive traffic to the listings you want to sell. Use emails to highlight new listings that you need to gain Recent Sales to increase Best Match placement.

Combine email marketing with your other initiatives such as Best Offers. Tactics such as “We’ll accept best offers of just £x.xx from email subscribers” for a particular item work really well – giving an exclusive deal (even if it’s not) is a great way to get some quick sales and boost your search standing.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:10:23 PM
6) MarkDown Manager

Have a sale! What better way to boost your search rank than to give a discount. However this is getting harder to implement in the UK as only GTC BINs will ever qualify. If you’re almost anywhere bar the UK you’ll find it much easier to hold a MarkDown Manager sale (listings in the UK have to be 28 days or older before they can be included in a MarkDown sale).

This is a tactic that can also be used on older listings which have fallen from the top of Best Match as a way to regain recent sales.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:10:47 PM
7) Listing Enhancements

So you’re seeing some success but you can’t get right to the top of search results. All is not lost as, once you’ve got to the first page, you can add some enhancements to make your listing stand out.

Featured Plus will get you to the top of the page (£14.95 for up to 10 days, £44.95 for up to 30 days), but there are other low cost enhancements such as Bold, Highlight and Subtitle which are also good value. They might not get you to the top of the page but they’ll catch the eye of any buyer who scrolls down looking for a good deal.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:12:02 PM
Thank you for your answer , Re; price I have found using above example I am better at $44 with free postage than at $29 with $15 postage same TOTAL price , but now my postage cost is way over average.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:14:30 PM
Thanks for tips I used to for some items always use featured plus.  In australia most catagories in featured plus is $15. I will look at rotating use tactic.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:16:06 PM
There's also one important snippet of information I found regarding multi-variant listings for sites that they are available on. Previously the Recent Sales score was based on the Best Matched item in the variant

e.g. if you sold 10 red 5 blue 2 black and 1 Pink Mickey Mouse t-shirt and someone searched for "Mickey Mouse t-shirt" you'd get a score based on 10 sales (the highest match)

That's changed it now works on sales for all variations
http://pages.ebay.co.uk/sell/sellerupdate/bestmatch.html#a9
e.g in the example above searching again for "Mickey Mouse t-shirt" you'd get a score based on 18 sales (the total sales for the listing)

That means multi-variant listings are a must if they're appropriate for your product as even search for a "Pink Mickey Mouse t-shirt" gets a score of 18
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *FluffyDuckee* on November 18, 2009, 09:16:52 PM
Hi Chris,

Thanks for that info.  Yes it makes perfect sense that if you pay for a 'Featured First' it will always go to the top of the list (as long as it doesn't have to compete with a hoard of other sellers using 'Featured First'.  I notice you mention that if there are many sellers, the feature appears in a rotation.  So can you confirm here that if you have paid for 'Featured First' then no other factors can effect the postion of that highlighted listing other than a rotation?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:19:13 PM
Thank you for your answer , Re; price I have found using above example I am better at $44 with free postage than at $29 with $15 postage same TOTAL price , but now my postage cost is way over average.

Free postage does get a boost in best match. Also there is lots of anecdotal evidence both on and off eBay that buyers prefer it. More savvy buyers (in particular those that sell as well as buy) tend to be more discerning and look at total price, but in reality most buyers aren't that savvy.

It's also worth noting that from eBay internal tests they've told me that when buyers are presented with a choice they tend to purchase free post items more often and they can measure the effect by promoting them less or more. (and that's why sometimes you'll see what looks like unusual search results in you're in a particular test group or not)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:21:57 PM
Hi Chris,

Thanks for that info.  Yes it makes perfect sense that if you pay for a 'Featured First' it will always go to the top of the list (as long as it doesn't have to compete with a hoard of other sellers using 'Featured First'.  I notice you mention that if there are many sellers, the feature appears in a rotation.  So can you confirm here that if you have paid for 'Featured First' then no other factors can effect the postion of that highlighted listing other than a rotation?

In the UK only Top Sellers can use Featured First, so it's used much less frequently than before. Also Featured Plus has been scrapped in the UK so the only way to buy your way to the top is as a Top Seller.
Definitely if you use Featured First you'll only rotate with other Featured First listings - in the UK there are two slots reserved for Featured First (there used to be additional slots for Featured Plus listings that fell on the first page of search results so on other sites you may still see a mix of Featured First and Plus)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:22:44 PM
Featured plus as I understand it. now only moves you top of page you appear in best match with so if you are on page 50 under best match you will only be at top of page 50 the $15 cost in that case of very questionable benefit.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:27:42 PM
Featured plus as I understand it. now only moves you top of page you appear in best match with so if you are on page 50 under best match you will only be at top of page 50 the $15 cost in that case of very questionable benefit.

That's how it was supposed to work in the UK, but in reality they never programmed it correctly and for years it got you to the first page of search results which it shouldn't have done!  :o

On most other sites it works as it should, but when it comes into it's own is when buyer start refining searches. As soon as a search puts you on page 1 of results you're at the top.

If you're unfortunate enough to have your listings demoted in search as a below standard seller do NOT waste any of your money on listing features as they'll not benefit you much at all. You'd just have to ride the storm until you get back to being a standard seller and rely on people finding your listings in other ways and it will hurt your business, but at least you'll save on listing enhancement fees in the mean time.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:31:35 PM
Slightly off topic I believe about 90% of my buyers do not know how to turn off best match or how to refine searches. You would have broader experience what would your figure be?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:33:54 PM
Slightly off topic I believe about 90% of my buyers do not know how to turn off best match or how to refine searches. You would have broader experience what would your figure be?

I'd say that pretty much all buyers use the search option eBay present to them. At most as far as I can tell people will change to lowest price but are more likely to refine with product finders (the item specific options in the side bar) to refine searches.

They will click for just auctions or just fixed price as those tabs are more prominent and sometimes they just want to buy now and not bid on an auction
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *FluffyDuckee* on November 18, 2009, 09:35:10 PM
Thanks Chris

Is there a specific algorithm that is used for key words?  Can key words override other factors?

I recently conducted an experiment where I searched for title of a dvd and then the category:  

Snow White & Friends DVD 

This returned a listing with that title and the word DVD in the Ebay title.

I then changed the order and put the category first:

DVD Snow White & Friends

To my surprise I recieved a slightly differerent result and in fact in no. 4 of the list was Snow White and Friends 123456.  This did not have DVD in the title, but matched it higher than most other DVD's.

What would have caused this in your opinion?

Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:35:52 PM
I do think it's important to forget selling experience and your knowledge of the site and think like a buyer. It's very instructive to sit down with a novice eBay user and watch how they search for something with no input or help. It may surprise you what they do and how little the average buyer knows about using eBay.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 09:38:00 PM
Chris,

The term "below standard seller" is one about which I have some concerns...

It has been reported - and I have seen some instances - where sellers with 90-95% feedback and DSRs in the 4.5 - 4.7 range have listings ahead of a seller with 100% FB and DSRs of 4.8 and 4.9!

Do you have an understanding as to how this happens?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:38:55 PM
Thanks Chris

Is there a specific algorithm that is used for key words?  Can key words override other factors?

I recently conducted an experiment where I searched for title of a dvd and then the category:  

Snow White & Friends DVD 

This returned a listing with that title and the word DVD in the Ebay title.

I then changed the order and put the category first:

DVD Snow White & Friends

To my surprise I recieved a slightly differerent result and in fact in no. 4 of the list was Snow White and Friends 123456.  This did not have DVD in the title, but matched it higher than most other DVD's.

What would have caused this in your opinion?



eBay do (in some categories only!) use category and item specifics to augment keywords when deciding which products to recall for a search term. I've not been able to determine a full list or even a partial list with any accuracy but DVD is definitely a term that gets more weight even if it's not a keyword in the title.

Colours for clothing appear less predictable, but for multi-variant listings they 100% use item specifics, although I'm not convinced non multi-variant listings would have colours pulled from specifics.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:40:53 PM
chris I have a zero paypal payment average on my sales (long story) I suspect it affects my best match search results .Looking at my compeditors ( with about a 80% paypal payments history on sold items) and all other known factors taken into account.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:41:13 PM
Chris,

The term "below standard seller" is one about which I have some concerns...

It has been reported - and I have seen some instances - where sellers with 90-95% feedback and DSRs in the 4.5 - 4.7 range have listings ahead of a seller with 100% FB and DSRs of 4.8 and 4.9!

Do you have an understanding as to how this happens?

I don't know about Aus, but for UK it's possible to have poor feedback displayed (12 months) but be measured on recent feedback (3 mths). It depends on whether you're a high volume or low volume seller.

The reverse is also true - if you have fantastic 12 month feedback but your 3 month feedback and DSRs are poor then you could look like a good seller but be lowered in search results based on recent feedback
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:43:11 PM
chris I have a zero paypal payment average on my sales (long story) I suspect it affects my best match search results .Looking at my compeditors ( with about a 80% paypal payments history on sold items) and all other known factors taken into account.


I'm afraid I don't have experience of that - in the UK all listings have to offer PayPal as a payment option so naturally take up is high. I don't know if offering PayPal affects Best Match placement on other sites, but would be interested to find out if anyone out there knows?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:47:21 PM
Chris ebay Australia requires paypal is offered and I do end up with about 5% paypal payments for sales. However they are payments to my paypal account that can accept money . Not the paypal account I find best to list with. As I said a long story.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:51:16 PM
Chris ebay Australia requires paypal is offered and I do end up with about 5% paypal payments for sales. However they are payments to my paypal account that can accept money . Not the paypal account I find best to list with. As I said a long story.

I remember in the news eBay/PayPal's attempt to force themselves on users - a mistake in my opinion. They won't try that in the UK simply because the penetration of PayPal is so great it's not worth the hassle to try and enforce it on the minority. I always wonder what would have happened if they'd been like Amazon with a rigid payment structure from day 1 - no one complains that when they sell on Amazon that they can't use their own merchant account etc, but that's something eBay can't change (and sorry... a little off topic  :) )
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *FluffyDuckee* on November 18, 2009, 09:51:19 PM
Nic pic Chris!!!

In your opinion does perfectly matched key words override higher postage costs and sellers DSRs at any time?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 09:53:30 PM
Nic pic Chris!!!

In your opinion does perfectly matched key words override higher postage costs and sellers DSRs at any time?

There's no such thing as perfectly matched keywords - see http://tamebay.com/2009/11/best-match-secrets-part-1-getting-found.html

Keywords are simply what will get your listing in or out of the search recall. Either the buyers search included your keywords or they didn't, but they're unlikely to search for your entire listing title.

Once the search recall is determined it's then over to Best Match to order the results which is where postage costs/DSRs etc come into play.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 09:58:07 PM
Chris interesting comment about amazon payments I regularly buy on both USA amazon and ebay USA. I recently purchased a S/H camera and I noticed that Amazon USA was getting about twice the price for the same item Ebay USA was getting. It was quite a shock
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 09:58:10 PM
Chris,

The articles cited at the beginning of this thread make references to goods that are repeat sellers - such as T-shirts.  Gaining an impressions and sales 'history' is straightforward enough when you have an inventory of 1,000 consisting of 100 pieces of 10 products - but do you have any specific suggestions for products where the range is wider, but the sales per product are less? For example, an inventory of 1,000 but with 5 pieces of 200 products?

... which, for the most part, cannot be honestly presented in any multi-variant form of listing.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *smee* on November 18, 2009, 10:01:01 PM
Hi Chris ,
It has been suggested that by sellers creating false ID's or getting mates to put in offers on best offers this will promote the listing up the best match list
futher more it has been suggested that some actually purchase there own or their mates BIN items (but later mutually agree to cancel transaction)  for the same reason .... have you heard of this happening or can you see any benefit in doing this ?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 10:09:05 PM
Chris,

The articles cited at the beginning of this thread make references to goods that are repeat sellers - such as T-shirts.  Gaining an impressions and sales 'history' is straightforward enough when you have an inventory of 1,000 consisting of 100 pieces of 10 products - but do you have any specific suggestions for products where the range is wider, but the sales per product are less? For example, an inventory of 1,000 but with 5 pieces of 200 products?

... which, for the most part, cannot be honestly presented in any multi-variant form of listing.

I'm in the same boat - many of my items can't be multi-variant. There are two options - use more auctions and rely on buyers finding your products. eBay is without a doubt changing (Tesco, the third biggest retailer in the world is in the process of setting up on eBay UK as of this moment) and the best advice is to look at your inventory and source niche products which others don't have.

I know that's easy to say and not so easy to implement, but if 100 sellers all offer the same product I'm never going to be biggest, have the most stock, or be able to negotiate the best prices. I need to recognise that and work to my strengths
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 10:11:12 PM
Chris interesting comment about amazon payments I regularly buy on both USA amazon and ebay USA. I recently purchased a S/H camera and I noticed that Amazon USA was getting about twice the price for the same item Ebay USA was getting. It was quite a shock

Amazon quite simply attracts a different class of buyer - eBay and Amazon are getting ever closer in product range and listing format and it's going to be interesting to see how it plays out in the long term. Although many customers use both the vast majority appear to use either eBay or Amazon which is why ALL sellers should consider listing on multiple channels. The days of just eBay are well and truly over for most businesses.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 10:16:40 PM
Hi Chris ,
It has been suggested that by sellers creating false ID's or getting mates to put in offers on best offers this will promote the listing up the best match list
futher more it has been suggested that some actually purchase there own or their mates BIN items (but later mutually agree to cancel transaction)  for the same reason .... have you heard of this happening or can you see any benefit in doing this ?

Best offers are only any good if they turn into sales.
I've heard of it happening, I've no doubt it does happen, but I'd caution strongly against it. Contrary to popular opinion eBay are getting remarkably good at linking accounts and if you even log in to two accounts from the same PC they'll know it.

In reality large sellers simply can't do this as they have too many listings and not enough available totally unlinked accounts on different PCs in different locations to cover their entire product range. If you have 1000 fixed price listings gaining 1000 unlinked accounts to place a best offer which then isn't paid (or is paid but refunded) isn't a practical option.

A wise ex-eBay employee once said to me "It's much easier to see conspiracy than to credit eBay with any intelligence or the ability to communicate effectively" and that's so true
:rofl:
(Not of course that I could possibly want to make fun of eBay ;-) )
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 10:26:11 PM
.....
I've heard of it happening, I've no doubt it does happen, but I'd caution strongly against it. Contrary to popular opinion eBay are getting remarkably good at linking accounts and if you even log in to two accounts from the same PC they'll know it.....
A wise ex-eBay employee once said to me "It's much easier to see conspiracy than to credit eBay with any intelligence or the ability to communicate effectively" and that's so true
(Not of course that I could possibly want to make fun of eBay ;-) )
Chris with out going into specifics on a few higher priced items it is in fact incredibly easy to do for some one with knowledge of the IT industry with the right options available. In ebay Australian forums a few years ago we had a ID micks folly who retired from embarrassing ebay as it was too easy and continuing no longer served any purpose.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 10:31:13 PM
Chris, we have our own home-grown site called OZtion that is a direct alternative in terms of structure.  It still is patchy in terms of sales across the spectrum, but that is slowly moving ahead from what I've seen.

It has had a notable and continuing growth in membership commensurate with the degree of disruption from eBay's "disruptive innovation" and frustration of both buyers and sellers alike.

This is especially true when bulk quantities of overseas products (especiallly from our northern neighbours) appear to flood various categories with often sub-standard quality goods.

Have your efforts shown
 (a) any awareness of these issues by eBay
 (b) any consideration by eBay to address them (I notice "fine jewelry" has been recently reorganised
 (c) any suggestions for remedial tactics by sellers within the current circumstances?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 10:31:57 PM
Chris with out going into specifics on a few higher priced items it is in fact incredibly easy to do for some one with knowledge of the IT industry with the right options available. In ebay Australian forums a few years ago we had a ID micks folly who retired from embarrassing ebay as it was too easy and continuing no longer served any purpose.

Easy to do on a couple of items, incredibly difficult to do on an ongoing basis for a pro seller on 1000s of items. As I said I've no doubt it may happen, but not something I'd be willing to risk my business on or suggest anyone else does.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 18, 2009, 10:39:16 PM
Thank you Chris for your time, and insights. I have to go and feed the animals 4 and 2 legged ones before they eat each other. I will read more later. I am sure all people here at this forum are happy to have you visit any time you want
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 10:41:46 PM
Chris with out going into specifics on a few higher priced items it is in fact incredibly easy to do for some one with knowledge of the IT industry with the right options available. In ebay Australian forums a few years ago we had a ID micks folly who retired from embarrassing ebay as it was too easy and continuing no longer served any purpose.

Easy to do on a couple of items, incredibly difficult to do on an ongoing basis for a pro seller on 1000s of items. As I said I've no doubt it may happen, but not something I'd be willing to risk my business on or suggest anyone else does.

I might add that, even if you were able to structure a multiple-ID multiple IP address metrics stimulating program, by its very nature you would likely be generating a pattern of usage on your inventory that could make itself obvious and/or enable isolation.  The more products involved, the greater this risk.

And I have little doubt that, if discovered, eBay would not be amused...!
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 10:42:10 PM
Chris, we have our own home-grown site called OZtion that is a direct alternative in terms of structure.  It still is patchy in terms of sales across the spectrum, but that is slowly moving ahead from what I've seen.

It has had a notable and continuing growth in membership commensurate with the degree of disruption from eBay's "disruptive innovation" and frustration of both buyers and sellers alike.

This is especially true when bulk quantities of overseas products (especiallly from our northern neighbours) appear to flood various categories with often sub-standard quality goods.

Have your efforts shown
 (a) any awareness of these issues by eBay
 (b) any consideration by eBay to address them (I notice "fine jewelry" has been recently reorganised
 (c) any suggestions for remedial tactics by sellers within the current circumstances?

I've noticed practically every alternative site has had pick up from new buyers. I think it's driven by a number of things - sellers are spreading their wings. Buyers are maturing with the Internet and happy to buy from sites other than main stream. That's why many sellers are having great success with their own websites.  Alternative sites in the UK at least they're all struggling to gain traction, even those that have been around for years. Niche websites from individual sellers are a much better option.

On the bulk quantities of overseas products that's more tricky. eBay are constantly trying to re-balance sites as whilst a flavour of overseas goods gives buyers choice being flooded with them isn't good. It's no secret that in general a domestic transaction is more likely to be a good buying experience than an international one (e.g. DSR qualification for Top Seller is based on domestic transactions only) so it's not desirable that the site is overloaded with overseas sellers.

Have eBay got the balance right? Not yet. Does Best Match help? Yes, because every time a buyers sees (a search impression) and doesn't buy (a sale) the score on that listing goes down so through best match buyers will eventually determine what's a quality listing and what's a less desirable listing.

(Auctions are a LOT more difficult to balance and eBay definitely have work to do in that area!)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 10:44:04 PM
Thank you Chris for your time, and insights. I have to go and feed the animals 4 and 2 legged ones before they eat each other. I will read more later. I am sure all people here at this forum are happy to have you visit any time you want

Thanks Shyer. I have about another 20 minutes and then I have to get on with some work as well, but I'll pop back later in the day and try to catch up. In the mean time if anyone has questions feel free to ping me a message or you can always catch me on TameBay (http://www.tamebay.com)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 10:47:14 PM
Polish up the crystal ball for this one.....


The inference from your last post is that things should stabilise over time and a better reflection of 'best match' actually approaching it's intention will come.


Any thoughts on when ..?  (How long do we hold our breath?)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: wyzeguy60 on November 18, 2009, 10:53:37 PM
hi Chris - only if you have time.
I only sell auction and always start at 99 cents.
I have 4.9, 5, 5, 5 stars
I always get good prices.
does best match disadvantage me
cheers
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *CountessA* on November 18, 2009, 10:55:34 PM
Chris, can you confirm that there are some aspects of the "best match" algorithm that are not known to the general public, and which may be presenting results that are sometimes quite noticeably different to what the buyer wants to see?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 11:05:58 PM
Polish up the crystal ball for this one.....


The inference from your last post is that things should stabilise over time and a better reflection of 'best match' actually approaching it's intention will come.


Any thoughts on when ..?  (How long do we hold our breath?)

eBay will never stabilise - sadly they'll always find something to tinker with, but yes over time more desirable listings should rise to the top... until eBay make another change
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 11:07:31 PM
Have eBay got the balance right? Not yet. Does Best Match help? Yes, because every time a buyers sees (a search impression) and doesn't buy (a sale) the score on that listing goes down so through best match buyers will eventually determine what's a quality listing and what's a less desirable listing.


I have one reservation on that .... It relies on buyers being persistent enough to have made enough 'impressions' and purchasing to bore through the rubbish.  In some of the niche areas, they may just give up before getting there or buy something sub-standard because that's all they found (by not examining ALL the pages of the returned search results).
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 11:07:47 PM
hi Chris - only if you have time.
I only sell auction and always start at 99 cents.
I have 4.9, 5, 5, 5 stars
I always get good prices.
does best match disadvantage me
cheers

Best Match doesn't affect you in the slightest! :-D Auctions are sorted time ending soonest and the only thing you have to worry about is not dropping DSRs to become sub-standard and being demoted in search. Other than that you've nothing to worry about other than your listing title and item specifics to make sure your products get found in the search recall
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *CountessA* on November 18, 2009, 11:11:50 PM
The sense I get is that whoever is involved in inputting ideas, and the majority of those making the decisions, and all of those involved in implementing those ideas (technically), actually don't use eBay. They approach it from an ivory tower perspective where the ivory comes from the tusks of their own dead white elephant graveyard of comprehension. New "changes" seem to be rolled out without regard to whether they're of any use.

It reminds me a little of the way Sultan Moulay Ismael would tear down the back-breaking work of his unfortunate white slaves during and after the Restoration period. (Giles Milton - "White Gold".) Pointless, pointless, pointless...
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 11:14:55 PM
Chris, can you confirm that there are some aspects of the "best match" algorithm that are not known to the general public, and which may be presenting results that are sometimes quite noticeably different to what the buyer wants to see?

I don't know about other sites but in the UK everything that's "in" best match is on http://tamebay.com/2009/11/best-match-secrets-part-2-how-products-are-sorted.html

The part eBay tinker with is what is "best value". Currently eBay consider the best value to be the rate at which an item sells but that has changed in the past.

Often changes are tests which eBay are constantly running to verify what works and what doesn't
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 11:18:59 PM
I have one reservation on that .... It relies on buyers being persistent enough to have made enough 'impressions' and purchasing to bore through the rubbish.  In some of the niche areas, they may just give up before getting there or buy something sub-standard because that's all they found (by not examining ALL the pages of the returned search results).

The sense I get is that whoever is involved in inputting ideas, and the majority of those making the decisions, and all of those involved in implementing those ideas (technically), actually don't use eBay. They approach it from an ivory tower perspective where the ivory comes from the tusks of their own dead white elephant graveyard of comprehension. New "changes" seem to be rolled out without regard to whether they're of any use.

It reminds me a little of the way Sultan Moulay Ismael would tear down the back-breaking work of his unfortunate white slaves during and after the Restoration period. (Giles Milton - "White Gold".) Pointless, pointless, pointless...

For sure there was a long bedding in period when Best Match was introduced and sellers saw very volatile search results and sales.

I've often complained that eBay 1) Don't use the site enough and 2) Don't share enough valuable information -  The second is a view shared by Dan Wilson (http://tamebay.com/2009/11/dan-wilson-ebay-is-a-sphinx.html) who used to work for eBay
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *smee* on November 18, 2009, 11:19:37 PM
It reminds me a little of the way Sultan Moulay Ismael would tear down the back-breaking work of his unfortunate white slaves during and after the Restoration period. (Giles Milton - "White Gold".) Pointless, pointless, pointless...
 
 
 
thats the first comparision that sprang to my mind to Countess  :rofl:
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 11:23:06 PM

Often changes are tests which eBay are constantly running to verify what works and what doesn't


While the logic of doing this live is obvious, the morality of it is abhorrent - especially when it is directly affecting sales and income of sellers.

* steps off soapbox *
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *CountessA* on November 18, 2009, 11:25:24 PM
Smee, I knew we'd be on the same wavelength here... Would you like to borrow my copy of Harald's Chronicle of the Slavs, which may provide you with some other apt comparisons?

Chris, have you noticed at all any difference in the type of "best match" results on different eBay sites?

When I look for antique items, I don't even bother checking on eBay.com.au. Even though I'd specify the same search terms, and tick "Worldwide", I would get only a fraction of the results that I'd receive if I checked on eBay.co.uk with the exact same search terms.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 18, 2009, 11:27:19 PM
Smee ....?

Smee ....?

(I think his eyes have glazed over.......)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 18, 2009, 11:32:08 PM
Smee, I knew we'd be on the same wavelength here... Would you like to borrow my copy of Harald's Chronicle of the Slavs, which may provide you with some other apt comparisons?

Chris, have you noticed at all any difference in the type of "best match" results on different eBay sites?

When I look for antique items, I don't even bother checking on eBay.com.au. Even though I'd specify the same search terms, and tick "Worldwide", I would get only a fraction of the results that I'd receive if I checked on eBay.co.uk with the exact same search terms.

I have to admit (shame on me!) to not searching on many International sites and am not particularly well up on International Site Visibility. I would recommend experimenting and listing directly onto the site where you get the most sales
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *CountessA* on November 18, 2009, 11:35:37 PM
Ah, I'm the other side of the equation - a buyer.

I speak solely as a buyer when I say the "best match" is so frustrating that I immediately set my search parameters automatically to "lowest price" instead.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: gr8-expectations on November 19, 2009, 12:19:06 AM
HI CHRIS,

thanks for taking the time out to come here, when ebay introduced "best" match, i began using again a search engine for books (i like mine rare usually and my steak doa) called auction sieve because it took ages on ebays search engine to find what i was looking for across the world and here, now i almost never bother with ebays search engine, its so bad and so commercial, auction sieve finds auctions on ebay for me that ebay rarely if ever finds and around the world.

i think ebay sold out big time by implementing best match and when i do use ebays search engine i hate having to reset it to ending soonest which should be the default, a designer friend said he really hates the fact the ending auctions screen is nowhere on the au home page as it used to be, i never used to look at that but he obviously did. the only positive thing i can say as a regular user about ebays new engine is the random things i find, but really i could do without that.

since when did dsrs mean anything since ebay have destroyed the feedback process virtually? to me ebay is like rats on the treadmill, all the unique things about it and the lovely sellers with special items are gradually leaving imo, there are still some great sellers there for what i buy but rare books, antiques and art arent widgets and (to me) ebay cant see the difference

sorry to be so frank but someone needs to give this feedback
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Brum6y* on November 19, 2009, 12:35:55 AM
Indeed.

Thank you Chris for your time and input.

I'm sure there are many more twists and turns that we will need to deal with - but when you have stuck with eBay for as long as many of us have, it is an acquired skill.

Will see what else we can dig up for you...
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 19, 2009, 05:35:30 AM
Hi gr8-expectations, I have to agree that Best Match isn't ideally suited for rare items. The problem is that by definition there'll only ever be one of a particular item in a certain condition so everything is a unique listings.

Brumby "sticking with eBay" is about right. I remember when you just had to stick up an item with a title and two line description and if you had a picture that made you stand out! Can you imagine selling something without a picture these days? Times change and the one sure thing about selling on eBay is that if a seller isn't constantly changing to keep up with eBay then sadly they're not going to be around for long
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 19, 2009, 05:42:18 AM
(http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r271/rontello/eBay%20nasty%20pix-gifs/buyerseller2.gif)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 19, 2009, 08:12:06 AM
(http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r271/rontello/eBay%20nasty%20pix-gifs/Natasha_Boris.gif)
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 19, 2009, 08:21:41 AM
Boosting the Thread Ratings:

(http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r271/rontello/eBay%20nasty%20pix-gifs/132675050_o.jpg)

Greetings Mr. Dawson!  :t2:

Checkout my feedback!
http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=898sarahg&ftab=AllFeedback (http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewFeedback2&userid=898sarahg&ftab=AllFeedback)

rontello.com (http://rontello.com) :drummer:

C):-{= <"cheap, shameless plugs are our specialty! "<<
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: gr8-expectations on November 19, 2009, 09:48:34 AM
Thanks for your reply Chris I appreciate it.

Tello that is excellent feedback and something you can be really proud of m8! well done
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: wyzeguy60 on November 19, 2009, 10:20:06 AM
hey tello

have you mutated ??????

" This great customer has mutated into an awesome multiple bidder. A+++ "

 :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 19, 2009, 12:08:40 PM
Countessa writes " When I look for antique items, I don't even bother checking on eBay.com.au. Even though I'd specify the same search terms, and tick "Worldwide", I would get only a fraction of the results that I'd receive if I checked on eBay.co.uk with the exact same search terms."

I used to sell a lot internationally now with current items and high Australian dollar and paypal costs and P$P needing expensive registered tracked post I no longer bother. When a seller lists an item they have some choices to offer wordwide or to certain continents. My experience is if you do not tick wordwide but tick north America and Europe for example . Items will often not appear in Europe or north American search. Only worldwide tick will show on all sites.

Most sellers do not sell to Nigeria Etc. You are better ticking worldwide but in listing, list areas not sent to. The other thing I have had a lot of trouble with are eBay's "HELP" programs like turd o lister, ebay is always fiddling if you use those programs your default setting get freequently changed to eBay's new defaults. I find sell something similar the safest way to list.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: shyer on November 19, 2009, 12:21:29 PM
I do think it's important to forget selling experience and your knowledge of the site and think like a buyer. It's very instructive to sit down with a novice eBay user and watch how they search for something with no input or help. It may surprise you what they do and how little the average  buyer knows about using eBay.

Chris I could not agree more and would also use the word "MOST" as well as "AVERAGE" and with eBay constantly "FIDDLING" many buyers are completely confused and out of frustration leave or buy the first thing that seems like good value. Best Mismatch has been a buying boomtime for me in items I collect. Searching by ending soonest or least price I have picked up some real bargains. I also notice what I call the spread has widened. EG. Camera lens I am interested in Pentax 50mm f1.2 in perfect glass condition used to sell in eBay USA $200 to $250, now it is usually $150 to $300
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 19, 2009, 01:05:41 PM
hey tello

have you mutated ??????

" This great customer has mutated into an awesome multiple bidder. A+++ "

 :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:

ENVY!!!
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 19, 2009, 04:02:41 PM
Allied Troops are at the ready, Sir!

 :sinbin:
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 19, 2009, 04:04:59 PM
Thanks for your reply Chris I appreciate it.

Tello that is excellent feedback and something you can be really proud of m8! well done

Yeah. I'm getting slapped here cuz I'm more colorful than YOU!

Ask around.....
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: TameBayChris on November 19, 2009, 11:01:18 PM
If anyone still has Best Match questions there's going to be a Webinar on Thursday, November 26th, 2009 (http://www.channeladvisor.co.uk/webinars/701000000009F36.html) at 3.00pm (GMT) hosted by ChannelAdvisor and eBay.

Susanne Kaden, Manager Best Match Europe, eBay will be attending, but bear in mind it's aimed at selling on eBay UK so some Best Match features may differ to what you find on eBay Australia
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *CountessA* on November 19, 2009, 11:02:15 PM
Thanks, Chris. You've been very helpful and generous with your time, and I hope we see more of you here.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 20, 2009, 03:27:10 PM
...and I hope we see more of you here.

Don't count on it!

He's done.

And so are we.

Next topic, please....
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *cupie* on November 20, 2009, 03:38:12 PM
Pay no attention to Tello, Chris...he's American, and the yanks are none too pleased with Ebay's 'Innovative Disruptions' either...That makes 3 English speaking countries that all consider Ebay's 'Innovative Disruptions' anything but Innovative...loss of profit for sellers, loss of choice for buyers....welcome to the strip mall...

(http://i404.photobucket.com/albums/pp125/cueperkins/Paragon-Demolition.jpg)

Drop in anytime....
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 20, 2009, 04:21:27 PM
Tell him about that "Banned For Life" gig with me and the eBay US Forums!

 :tanty:
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *CountessA* on November 20, 2009, 08:30:44 PM
To all who were not advised of this already:

Hear ye, hear ye. The party of the first part, known as Tello from Montello, hath been barred for life from the forums of the party of the second part, to wit, eBay's forums. It is hereby admitted that Tello is no angel, yet hath he performed that which calls upon itself such dire and eternal punishment? For lo, he sayeth that it is not so, that this sore thing was because of the parties of the third part, they who have fought against him with the weapon of the report button.

Here endeth the advisement.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: tellomon on November 21, 2009, 05:52:12 AM
That works for me!

THX!
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: Philip.Cohen on April 03, 2010, 07:27:24 PM
Funny, maybe I'm imagining things but eBay gatekeeper, Chris Dawson (eBay: mountcomp), has currently no items listed for sale, no "completed listings" (last 14 days) listed, and no store listings either. Maybe he's given up on eBay too, finally. And yet there are feedbacks left for items sold within the past 14 days! What's going on? More eBay glitches?
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: Roo on April 03, 2010, 08:02:30 PM
Maybe he has kids on School Holidays? Maybe just having a break? Not everyone keeps listing 24/7/365.
Title: Re: The Chris Dawson Q & A Thread regarding "best Match"
Post by: *Yibida* on April 03, 2010, 09:14:55 PM
Funny, maybe I'm imagining things but eBay gatekeeper, Chris Dawson (eBay: mountcomp), has currently no items listed for sale, no "completed listings" (last 14 days) listed, and no store listings either. Maybe he's given up on eBay too, finally. And yet there are feedbacks left for items sold within the past 14 days! What's going on? More eBay glitches?


""no "completed listings" (last 14 days) listed, and no store listings either. Maybe he's given up on eBay too, finally. And yet there are feedbacks left for items sold within the past 14 days! What's going on? More eBay glitches?""

No Not Glitchs Phil... just the authority / ability to manipulate the beast at will... absolute power to do what he wants with the system at any time he chooses... what spineless employee is going to question him ?....